- Rydberg is magnificent, sir.
- The energy levels of multi-electron atoms can be explained by the Rydberg formula through vertical and horizontal shifts. Therefore, Rydberg is magnificent, sir.
- Assuming that the nodes of the orbitals are photon-ether, there is a high possibility that there are rules (patterns) governing the energy at which photon-ether accumulate.
- Placing the orbits in order of circular ether reveals distinct patterns. Therefore, a reassessment of the orbital classification method based on the linear ether counts of s, p, d orbitals may be necessary.
- Further exploration of horizontal movements may lead to the creation of a new equation describing Hunt's rules.
- In summary, there is a possibility that the energy levels of electrons involve addition.
It is challenging to determine whether what has been described so far provides sufficient evidence to prove the existence of ether. Although it may be premature to call the nodes of the orbitals as photon-ether, considering them as material with mass, I believe it is still too early. However, I am confident that we can more clearly explain the quantum nature of the energy levels of electrons with my explanation. This is because a spark of light transitioning into photon-ether in an instant is likely to possess the property of quantity. In this concluding section, under the assumption that this hypothesis is correct, I will organize other possibilities that can be considered later. Of course, the notion that this could be purely speculative is an underlying premise throughout this document.
(1-1) Where is time?
According to the theory of relativity, the speed of matter affects its mass and time. If we consider the increase in mass as an increase in the density of ether, then the spark within it will naturally slow down. The slowing down of the speed of particles that make up us could imply that time is flowing slowly for us. Could the perceived time be related to the speed of the sparks that make us up?
The assumption above illustrates the position of time. The universe is spacetime. However, according to the assumption, time becomes a property of matter. Each piece of matter becomes an entity with its own time. The universe is an empty space without time, and matter becomes spacetime.
If time does not exist in the universe, what changes might occur? With my limited knowledge, nothing would happen. Let's assume a universe with only one planet. This planet is moving at a constant velocity. The particles that make up the planet each have their own time, but their times would be the same because they are in the same inertial frame. From this perspective, the velocity is constant. It's not a relative concept. Relative velocity only arises when an observer is present. Now let's assume an observer. Velocity, mass, and time become relative concepts. “Oh, that planet is moving at n km/s relative to me. Time dilation is occurring relative to me on that planet. The relative mass of that planet is heavier than mine.” These are observed based on the properties the observer has.
Time is the speed of sparks and a property of matter.
(1-2) Time Dilation
If time is a property of matter, it is a force and energy. When the property of speed increases, the property of mass (gravity) also increases, and conversely, the property of time decreases. Thus, the forces of gravity and time change oppositely based on the property of velocity. This is similar to the relationship between electricity and magnetism. If electricity is essentially magnetism, and magnetism is essentially electricity, gravity and time might also share the same essence. The fact that light has a constant speed everywhere might be because it is not bound by ether. It's a free sparkle without ether.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26c24/26c242778e9c796a1a14ad250ba46a971941bd92" alt="Time Dilation under Ether-Sparkle Perspective"
Applying this, we can explain time dilation more neatly. In different inertial systems, in different gravities, the speed of sparks changes, leading to a change in time. It's not that time exists in our universe, but each piece of matter has its own time. The time of the many pieces of matter that make us up would also flow differently. Time would flow differently within the same physical system, just as the mass difference between a proton and an electron. And this could be the reason why atomic clocks are precise. Matter possesses time.
(1-3) Absolute Time and Absolute Velocity
If time is a property of matter, another property that changes it is velocity. Then, what velocity and time do we possess? We orbit around the Sun, and the solar system revolves around our galaxy. Our galaxy? We exist in such an inertial system. In an inertial system with a smaller velocity, the sparks will move faster, and the magnitude of time will increase. So, could there be an inertial frame with absolute time somewhere? The slowest place in the universe, where time flows the fastest.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bdeca/bdecab1c5c21584c2cd14f8cddf8a949db01b7b5" alt="Finding Absolute Time"
Let's conduct a thought experiment. Place two measuring devices on an orbital path. Device 2 is stationary, and Device 1 is moving at twice the speed of Earth's orbit. From the perspective of Earth, both devices will be moving away relatively equally. Will their times be the same? If we launch measuring devices in the direction of the Sun's orbit around our galaxy, will their times be the same? This is easily predictable. They would, of course, be different.
Expanding this further, if we launch measuring devices in various directions from Earth, we might be able to understand in which direction our galaxy is moving. Combining these, could we find absolute time? The answer would be yes if our galaxy moves in a specific direction, at a specific speed, reaching absolute time. Of course, this thought assumes that our galaxy is not influenced by external celestial bodies, and in reality, the influences of our galactic neighborhood could be significant.
(2) Double-Tunnel Experiment
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65870/65870ef8194652993a5b69ccf960138145bfb7b2" alt="Double-Tunnel Experiment"
One such experiment involves creating a double tunnel instead of a double slit. If we elongate the double slit to create a tunnel-like structure and confine electrons within it, what would happen? Ether divided into A and B sections would occupy each tunnel, and sparks would travel between the two ethers. Observing this, electrons in each tunnel would probabilistically exist, and when observed simultaneously, they would appear in only one tunnel. One ether could vanish, possibly being absorbed beyond space into the other ether. If not, the universe would overflow with split ethers, making it unstable.
Surprisingly, this scenario has been experimentally validated. In the experiment, a neutron was passed through two channels, altering its spin in each. The spin change was observed to influence both sides. Quantifying the presence of a neutron in the paths of an interferometer
(3) Separated Ether is Quantum Entanglement?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/76028/76028195bd6bac2e8fc3d23dcba17b8bf395f755" alt="The Quantum Entanglement under Ether-Sparkle Perspective"
Sparks behave as if two ethers are one
According to the hypothesis, the electron-ether demonstrated division by the photon-ether. In the double-slit experiment, the electron-ether also splits into two. Sparks within the divided ethers freely traverse both sides. Even when one ether is separated in the coordinate space as we perceive it, it functions as the same ether. Quantum entanglement might arise from the properties of ethers, cautiously suggesting such an opinion.
Fin